Install this theme
Has anyone else noticed Daniel Assange has deleted his twitter and facebook?

It is well within his rights to do that, and he is probably better off that way.

It is still intriguing, however…

julian-assange-fanciers-guild:

VivantLeaks.org is a new site cataloging the pathological proliferation of ‘death to Assange’ sites that have been popping up like genital warts on the web.
‘Yeah, it’s freedom of speech too’, bleats some online commentary. How would they react if it was a Muslim dude with a beard buying domain names like DeathToTheUSA.com?
If incitements to murder are supported by freedom of speech principles, then we could theoretically absolve every Taliban and Al-Qaeda member who has disseminated messages endorsing the murder of United States and other foreign citizens.
[Image via exiledsurfer]

julian-assange-fanciers-guild:

VivantLeaks.org is a new site cataloging the pathological proliferation of ‘death to Assange’ sites that have been popping up like genital warts on the web.

‘Yeah, it’s freedom of speech too’, bleats some online commentary. How would they react if it was a Muslim dude with a beard buying domain names like DeathToTheUSA.com?

If incitements to murder are supported by freedom of speech principles, then we could theoretically absolve every Taliban and Al-Qaeda member who has disseminated messages endorsing the murder of United States and other foreign citizens.

[Image via exiledsurfer]

soupsoup:

A WikiLeaks release of U.S. diplomatic cables has revealed that the Bush administration planned ways to retaliate against Europe for its refusal to use genetically modified seeds. (via Mercola and @ChrisDimare)

Ministers opposed whaling legal action

streamsofwikileaks:

The controversy surrounding Australia’s legal action against Japan’s whaling program has deepened, with revelations that senior Labor ministers were against the idea.

But Australian diplomatic officials said a long international court case would at least take public pressure off the government for a few years.

via news.smh.com.au

It was three months into Barack Obama’s presidency, and the administration — under pressure to do something about alleged abuses in Bush-era interrogation policies — turned to a Florida senator to deliver a sensitive message to Spain:

Don’t indict former President George W. Bush’s legal brain trust for alleged torture in the treatment of war on terror detainees, warned Mel Martinez on one of his frequent trips to Madrid. Doing so would chill U.S.-Spanish relations.

Commonly, the authorities don’t much like to crush apple-cheeked white-guy hackers like Bradley Manning. It is hard to charge hackers with crimes, even when they gleefully commit them, because it’s hard to find prosecutors and judges willing to bone up on the drudgery of understanding what they did. But they have pretty much got to make a puree out of this guy, because of massive pressure from the gravely embarrassed authorities. Even though Bradley lacks the look and feel of any conventional criminal; wrong race, wrong zipcode, wrong set of motives.

Bradley’s gonna become a *spy* whose *espionage* consisted of making the activities of a democratic government visible to its voting population. With the New York Times publishing the fruits of his misdeeds. Some set of American prosecutorial lawyers is confronting this crooked legal hairpin right now. I feel sorry for them.

Bruce Sterling’s epic assessment of Wikileaks, Assange and modern diplomacy has been getting a lot of play around the interwebs, but it is Sterling’s portrait of Bradley Manning that resonates most strongly.  They are going to  crush that poor boy. (via thegoverned)

eriknchristensen:

WikiLeaks has released the most comprehensive and detailed account of any war ever to have entered the public record. (October 26th, 2010) - http://blog.amnestyusa.org/us/failed-accountability-wikileaks-show-true-cost-of-war/

Still Confused? Read more @ sowhyiswikileaksagoodthingagain.com