It is well within his rights to do that, and he is probably better off that way.
It is still intriguing, however…
julian-assange-fanciers-guild:
VivantLeaks.org is a new site cataloging the pathological proliferation of ‘death to Assange’ sites that have been popping up like genital warts on the web.
‘Yeah, it’s freedom of speech too’, bleats some online commentary. How would they react if it was a Muslim dude with a beard buying domain names like DeathToTheUSA.com?
If incitements to murder are supported by freedom of speech principles, then we could theoretically absolve every Taliban and Al-Qaeda member who has disseminated messages endorsing the murder of United States and other foreign citizens.
[Image via exiledsurfer]
julian-assange-fanciers-guild:
A member of Australia’s political right weighs in on the debate over Julian Assange. (via the Sydney Morning Herald)
I recently put the proposition, to a senior frontbencher in Federal Parliament, that the WikiLeaks horse had bolted, and that shutting down Julian Assange could not…
“It is interesting to contrast Julia Gillard’s response to Andrew Wilkie, now the independent member for Denison. Wilkie’s principal claim to fame is that he leaked state secrets, which he came across while employed as an analyst in the Office of National Assessments.
The ONA leak was intended to damage the Howard government’s rationale for Australian involvement in Iraq, so it was greeted by the ALP as an act of heroism. The ALP’s response was to give Wilkie the preferences required to get elected to Parliament, to invite him to join an ALP/Green/independent alliance and to offer to pass whistleblower legislation to protect him and people like him.
By contrast, Gillard’s response to the US diplomatic cables leak is that ”the foundation of WikiLeaks is an illegal act”. But six weeks after this assertion was made, no one has named a law which was broken.”
A WikiLeaks release of U.S. diplomatic cables has revealed that the Bush administration planned ways to retaliate against Europe for its refusal to use genetically modified seeds. (via Mercola and @ChrisDimare)
via news.smh.com.auThe controversy surrounding Australia’s legal action against Japan’s whaling program has deepened, with revelations that senior Labor ministers were against the idea.
But Australian diplomatic officials said a long international court case would at least take public pressure off the government for a few years.
Julian’s Swedish case has been moved to the “terrorism” court at Belmarsh Jan 11 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/3714864.stmvia The offical wikileaks twitter account.Just FYI for the people following the tumblr account, I have an rss feed of the @wikileaks twitter account…
It was three months into Barack Obama’s presidency, and the administration — under pressure to do something about alleged abuses in Bush-era interrogation policies — turned to a Florida senator to deliver a sensitive message to Spain:
Don’t indict former President George W. Bush’s legal brain trust for alleged torture in the treatment of war on terror detainees, warned Mel Martinez on one of his frequent trips to Madrid. Doing so would chill U.S.-Spanish relations.
Commonly, the authorities don’t much like to crush apple-cheeked white-guy hackers like Bradley Manning. It is hard to charge hackers with crimes, even when they gleefully commit them, because it’s hard to find prosecutors and judges willing to bone up on the drudgery of understanding what they did. But they have pretty much got to make a puree out of this guy, because of massive pressure from the gravely embarrassed authorities. Even though Bradley lacks the look and feel of any conventional criminal; wrong race, wrong zipcode, wrong set of motives.
Bradley’s gonna become a *spy* whose *espionage* consisted of making the activities of a democratic government visible to its voting population. With the New York Times publishing the fruits of his misdeeds. Some set of American prosecutorial lawyers is confronting this crooked legal hairpin right now. I feel sorry for them.
krza:
Corporate media tells us what to think.
That’s right. Look at this headline. Look at this article. This is an example of federally subsidized media telling us how to think. Obama is toasting to his victories, let’s all celebrate him in his ground breaking presidency (perhaps with a “prestigious” award- Nobel prize, dare I say?)
I’ve seen the news. I’ve heard the “celebration” of the DADT repeal (read: solution to the need for more cannon fodder in Iraq). I’ve listened to all of the “Obama unites both sides” rhetoric. But why is corporate media ignoring things of real importance that are happening? Well, because our beloved first black president wouldn’t look like such a great guy if we understood some of the behind the scenes moves.
Moves like the FCC’s service to communications corporations in the recent vote on net neutrality, which opens the door to a future of bleak, 1984-esque control of information on the last free medium, the internet. The federal government hates the recent outburst of damning information coming from well protected and heavily supported independent media. Wikileaks won’t be a future problem under the new net “neutrality” laws- we all saw corporate America side with Big Brother a few weeks back. Next time, ISPs will just block offending websites and filter information, as they now have the power to do so. Think I’m being alarmist? I think you’re naive.
The recent food safety modernization act opens the door to a tighter grip on independent farming and small business, giving more power to factory farms and evil, health hating, money loving, federally tied organizations like Monsanto and ADM.
Ah yes, the subjection to humiliation and draconian control of the TSA’s new full body scanners in our airports. Don’t even get me started.
Of course, there is the November authorization of the federal reserve to print more currency, further inflating our currency, and- as some chicken littles are predicting- bring about the complete collapse of our country, à la Great Depression. The shadowy stimulus was not spoken of and not reported on a few months ago- why not?
Because if we were all focused on these things, we might be more pissed off with Mr. President and his service of corporate lobbyists, veiled as progress.
The last 10 years have easily been the worst in the history of the United States. Endless war. Corporate America profiting off of everything from murder in the Middle East to the raping of middle class America and the destruction of the economy. Legalized torture and shadowy prisons. Blatant attacks on free speech and media. Regulation and monitoring of everything, from the way we move around the country and world, to the way we eat, to conversations we have.
I hate to be so realistic about things, but it’s time to wake the fuck up, America. Complacency is the death of liberty.
WikiLeaks has released the most comprehensive and detailed account of any war ever to have entered the public record. (October 26th, 2010) - http://blog.amnestyusa.org/us/failed-accountability-wikileaks-show-true-cost-of-war/
Still Confused? Read more @ sowhyiswikileaksagoodthingagain.com